Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Mac Killed My Inner Child

  1. #21
    Inactive Member Matty2phatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    253
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by darksparrow:
    That could possibly be the funnist thing I have seen in a long time.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I could tell by the fact you had to become a member just to say that heh [img]wink.gif[/img]

  2. #22
    Inactive Member jb_617's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 11th, 2004
    Posts
    769
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    As I said the last time the ol' OS-X, Wintel, Linux, BeOS, whatever, debate came up. You're all failures. Get an Atari. They're no use for cutting your film on and that's why I like 'em. [img]wink.gif[/img]

    If you're going to cut video then I can honestly say there's very little between Mac's and PC's. For real. They both have advantages and disadvantages and on balance IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE WHAT SYSTEM YOU USE. My personal choice would be a dedicated video editing machine but they cost several thousands and I can't afford one. The advantage is that I'm not an editor. Frankly if you try cutting a film or video on a sub ?2000 system and it crashes all over the place, you've got what you paid for. And Mac users, don't pretend that your OS never crashes because it does and you know it.

    For the record, I mainly use PC's, but also Mac's and ATARI as well.


    ---------------------

    I will re-state, however, for the record, that the MAC-Mini is a rip-off piece of crap.

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ May 09, 2005 10:51 AM: Message edited by: jb. ]</font>

  3. #23
    Inactive Member jb_617's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 11th, 2004
    Posts
    769
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Oh, I forgot, that "text based interface" as it seems to be being called, is no use if I can't get to the login screen. At least on other systems I can hold down a key at boot and be taken into my CMOS commands and DOS (or DOS-like thing) without trying to boot an OS.


    --------------------

    Hmmmm...DOS 5.1, did we ever need anything else?

  4. #24
    Senior Hostboard Member miker's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 16th, 1999
    Posts
    2,621
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Boot straight to the command line-
    Hold Apple+S at boot (single user mode)

    Hold T at boot - boot into firewire target disk mode (your Mac essentially becomes an external firewire harddrive so no you don't need to boot it to an OS).

    There's more.

    Enjoy your broken computers.

    You can get Atari emulators you know?

  5. #25
    Inactive Member jb_617's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 11th, 2004
    Posts
    769
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Why would I want to emulate my ATARI software on an inferior machine with poor hardware-software interfacing, limited multitasking, and a crippled OS? My ATARI does the job fine already.

    ATARI-TOS and GEM with MagiC. What else does anyone need?


    --------------------

    ATARI : For people who actually know something about computers.

  6. #26
    Inactive Member jb_617's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 11th, 2004
    Posts
    769
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Oh yeah, and it looks like those keyboard commands were super easy to find out.


    ---------------------

    Macs. Pah!

  7. #27
    Inactive Member jb_617's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 11th, 2004
    Posts
    769
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I found some interesting benchmarks that should settle the "which computer is best" debate forever. Enjoy:

    Chart 1

    and,

    Chart 2


    ---------------------

    Tell me I'm not open minded...

  8. #28
    Senior Hostboard Member miker's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 16th, 1999
    Posts
    2,621
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    atari an5

    tos104desktop stlow

    rescue

    Kanzune

  9. #29
    Inactive Member jb_617's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 11th, 2004
    Posts
    769
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Yeah. That makes a lot of sense Miker. Thanks for sharing.


    ---------------------

    Mac G4, OS-X, er...64Mb RAM, 32Mb Graphics memory...er...20Gb HDD...now let's see...oh..."firewire" yeah that's cool...and...yeah "Airport" (but that was extra) and a....wassit called?...the thing...er...well whatever. but it was only ?1200 so there! And it looks pretty.


    ---------------------

    Macs...because giving things a proper name is too confusing.

  10. #30
    Inactive Member peter_g's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    253
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Since you can't have a fraction of a person and 0.04 is closer to zero than to one your observation is consistent with the hypothesis that there is no correlation between Mac ownership and sexual orientation.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, his observation is consistent, but only to a tiny degree. Because homosexuals and Mac users are both a small minority, one person?s assertion that all the gay men he knows use PCs means almost nothing. However, for the same reason, another person?s assertion that all the gay men he knows use Macs strongly supports my theory.

    Let us assume:

    We are all straight guys who know 100 people, 2 of which are gay, and 5 or 6 of which own Macs.
    5 % of straight people use Macs, and five times that proportion of gay men - 25% - use Macs.

    Because we knew too few gay men or Mac owners to get an objective idea, most peoples experience would be the same as that of matty2phatty ? all the gay men they know use PCs and all the straight people they know use Macs, even though gay men are 5 times more likely to be Mac users.

    The only way we?ll ever know for sure if there is any correlation between sexuality and choice of computer architecture is if we conduct a massive census. I don?t really want to know that badly. I think we've already looked at this in enough detail. Just take my word for it ? Macs are gay gay gay.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •